|
We don't often agree with Minneapolis Star
Tribune columnist Nick Coleman, but he got one thing right in his
June 13 column; he acknowledges that Governor Pawlenty’s firm
opposition to comprehensive sex ed, and the DFL majority's
backing down on it, were the result of MFC's mobilization of
thousands of concerned parents who called the Governor and key
legislators urging them to reject it.
Click Here to read
column.
Click
Here to listen to MFC Tom Prichard
interviewed on WCCO.
We also agree with Coleman that "mainstream
parents" need to “make ourselves heard.” Please Nick, get as many
parents involved as possible, because the more parents are informed
of the unhealthy content in several sex education curricula, the
easier it is to defeat.
Predictably, Coleman ignored our central
theme; that teaching children sex activities such as anal and
anal-oral sex is unhealthy.
(An examination of several sex education curricula in
Minnesota revealed the unhealthy content listed above. See Birds &
Bees.)
We shouldn't be surprised then that Coleman
called the sex education bill “moderate.” As Coleman quotes MFC
statements that exposed the unhealthy curricula, we have to assume
he believes teaching children about anal sex, and anal-oral sex is
“moderate” as well.
MFC encourages parents to refer to
comprehensive sex education as “unhealthy.” “Mainstream” parents
understand that teaching this material to children grades 7-12 sex
is unhealthy. Most
legislators agree.
Also,
the well-documented rise in STDs and STIs in Minnesota clearly
indicates that current comp sex education is unhealthy as well. In fact, it is a colossal
failure as more children have become
infected. |