Guide to Independent Grassroots Activism
Your Opportunity to Influence Policy & Politics




Quick-Click
Table of Contents

Introduction
Underlying Premises
Format for the Guide
Kitchen Table Activism
Public Activism
Conclusion
Appendix

INTRODUCTION

One person can't do everything, but we dare not do nothing.
- Minnesota Family Council Activist Randy Miller, Owatonna

Some people are self-starters when it comes to independent grassroots political activism. They become involved in the political process in an ad hoc sort of way,

and so on--all without being asked. These people are rare. I don't think they are rare because of a lack of will, but because of a general lack of knowledge of

Once they get started, most people find the experience to be quite rewarding, but they need that initial confidence to get started.

I frequently hear from people who are interested in becoming involved in politics, but not in a serious way. In other words, they are interested in just dabbling in politics. In general, they need guidance as to how to proceed.

I have found several books dedicated to grassroots political activism, but those books seem to be written by serious political operatives who assume that anyone who gets involved in politics wants to evolve into their likeness. Such books also seem frequently to be geared toward people who are interested in organizing their own grassroots political organizations. I recognize this is not the case with everyone.

Therefore, this guide is dedicated to the people who wish to become involved in politics but who want politics to remain only a hobby — a fun pastime. For years, this is exactly what politics was for me — and nothing more — and I loved it. This guide is, moreover, geared toward those who are interested in independent activity, outside formal political organizations, which in many ways is more effective anyway.

 

UNDERLYING PREMISES

Readers might wonder if the methods outlined here are effective, successful, or noticed. The answer is yes. Elections are never won exclusively because of these methods, and legislation is not passed exclusively because of them. Nevertheless, these activities can make the marginal difference in winning elections and can provide the marginal influence in passing legislation.

First of all, as an independent grassroots activist, one must recognize that acting alone is not a bad thing. In fact, independent activism is some of the most effective political activity there is. Secondly, one must be willing to take the first step — once an activist has written one letter or made one phone call, subsequent activities become easier and easier (and more and more fun and rewarding).

Politicians often say that to win elections and to pass legislation, one must win in the arena of public opinion. That may be a misleading way of putting it. Winning public opinion takes place one person at a time. So, a better way of putting it would be to say that one must win in the arena of individual opinion. One person (preferably a friend) convincing another person of a position is what ultimately changes public opinion.

I like to use an example from a recent election to illustrate this point. A woman who worked for my mother could not decide how to vote in Minnesota's US Senate race. She was inclined to vote for one of the candidates — a woman — because of her gender. Then my mother, knowing this woman had had some difficulty in bearing children, pulled out one of my letters to the editor regarding the candidates and the abortion issue. After reading the letter, the woman, being staunchly pro-life, immediately decided to vote for the other candidate — the ultimate winner of the election. The woman also commented on how she appreciated hearing an endorsement from someone she respected. That is true grassroots activism, and that is how it works best.

Thoughtful letters to the editor, phone calls to friends and to legislators, conversations with friends and community groups, visits to politicians, and the like: these are effective grassroots activities. Again, the key is just to get started.

 

FORMAT FOR THE GUIDE TO GRASSROOTS ACTIVISM

I have divided this guide into two parts.

The first part of this guide discusses what I call "kitchen table activism." This part is dedicated especially to the housewives, retirees, and students who regularly call me to ask what they can do with a small amount of time and without having to leave their homes.

The second part of this guide is called "public activism" and discusses informal activities that take place outside the home. This brief part is dedicated to the political social animals. In this part, I have specifically tried to focus on political activities that could be viewed as fun social events, largely outside of formal political structures.

"... public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment, nothing can fail; without it, nothing can succeed. Consequently, he who molds public sentiment, goes deeper than he who enacts statutes or pronounces decisions."
Abraham Lincoln

 

KITCHEN TABLE ACTIVISM

There are basically two types of "kitchen table activism." These are

TELEPHONE ACTIVISM

There are three main kinds of telephone calls independent activists can make to be effective:

Calls to legislators

When calling legislators, it is likely that one will not reach the actual legislators, but rather their staffs. It is important to state clearly about what issue one is calling. It is best to know an exact bill number or at least a name of a particular piece of legislation. It is important also to state exactly what action one wants the legislator to take. There are lots of legislative maneuvers that technically do what constituents want, but which can negate the spirit of a piece of legislation. So, a call to a legislator (at least to one not inclined to agree with a constituent) must be well planned and prepared.

Legislative staffs do (or at least should) keep a tally of calls from each side of every specific issue. Ultimately, the legislator will be advised by the staff, including information about constituent calls.

Finally, it is important to follow up with thank-you calls or calls to express disappointment, as the case may be, based on a legislator's response to a call (in other words, based on how the legislator votes on the specific issue).

Calls to friends

Independent activists might call friends for a couple of reasons.

One is to generate additional calls to legislators on a particular issue. Volume of calls does matter. In the case of the Minnesota Legislature, there is one secretary for every two or three legislators. A few calls to each legislator can become like a crisis for a legislative office as it adds up to many calls for one staff member.

Other calls one might wish to generate to friends involve getting them to engage in other types of grassroots activism (other activities that will be mentioned here later, that is).

Of course, one of the most important calls an independent activist can make to friends is a get-out-the-vote type call right before an election. Independent activists should be grooming their friends to vote their way for a long time prior to an election, but ultimately the most important thing is indeed to get one's friends to the polls on Election Day to vote the right way.

Calls to radio call-in talk shows

Calls to radio call-in talk shows are good if an activist has some piece of knowledge that is not being discussed on a show.

Also, radio call-in talk shows sometimes present an opportunity to speak directly with politicians. When a friendly politician is on the air, it is good to call with "softball" questions that the politician can answer easily. When the opposition is on the air, it is good to call with pointed questions that press the politician for defense of a position or justification of a vote.

In any case, calls or statements made to radio talk shows should be well planned. It is good to write questions on a piece of paper before ever dialing the telephone. Questions for guests (like politicians) should be short, and they should not include long editorials or extended personal opinions—just simple questions. Informative statements can be longer, but should still be concise.

 

LETTER WRITING ACTIVISM

There are two main letters activists can write:

Letters to legislators

Letters to legislators are more private than letters to the editor. These are fairly simple to write, and they do influence legislators.

Legislators themselves often do not see the actual letters. Sometimes they see only a stack of letters on a particular issue, if their staff members decide to use the letters as a prop for visual effect. Usually, members of the legislators' staffs are the ones who read and respond to constituent letters. Legislative staffs are usually small, and therefore any number of letters, especially on the same topic, will have an influence.

There are some ground rules to follow in conceiving letters to legislators:

A letter to a legislator might take the following format:

Constituent name, address, and phone number at the end.

Here is a brief sample letter to a legislator, using the formula:

Dear Congressman _____:

I am writing to you as a mother of five children and grandmother of seven and as a 38-year resident of Willmar, Minnesota.

I am writing regarding the issue of partial-birth abortion. I understand that the US Congress will soon vote on whether to ban this procedure.

I am very much opposed to this gruesome procedure. One could hardly bear to see this procedure performed on a cat, let alone on a human. My husband and I have two children who were diagnosed with deformities before birth, and the doctors recommended that I undergo the partial-birth abortion procedure to "resolve" the situation. I refused, and I am very thankful that I did. Our children have brought more joy to our lives than we ever could have imagined.

I hope you will vote to ban partial-birth abortion.

Thank you very much,

Name
Address
Phone Number

 

NOTE:

Another letter to legislators that is important is the "thank you" letter to a legislator who has voted the right way. Legislators need to know that they have support for taking bold stands on issues.

For faster impact and faster response, activists should consider sending letters to legislators via e-mail. Most legislators and their staffs are on-line.

Letters to the editor

Letters to the editor are more public than letters to legislators, obviously.

Letters to the editor can be effective tools for grassroots activism. There are many people who read newspapers, and if they read that people like them believe a certain way on an issue or that people like them are voting for a certain candidate, then they are likely to follow suit. Many people don't have the political savvy to make decisions for themselves and need to have someone else's ideas to grasp. Others who have opinions one way or another need validation of their beliefs in the form of knowing there are others like them.

There are some times to write letters to the editor, and other times to refrain from doing so.

It is good to write during campaign seasons, when issues arise that highlight the differences between politicians, and to praise the work of politicians who agree with one's issues.

It is important to be proactive and not reactive. One should not respond directly to the opposition's letters. It is better to write a proactive letter supporting one's own position; otherwise, the opposition gets a second bit of attention by being mentioned in the reaction letter.

It is also important never to defend oneself vis-à-vis an attack by the opposition. Even if the opposition writes a letter criticizing an earlier letter, even with personal attacks, one should not respond back. Attacks by the opposition will make the opposition look worse than the attack will make the original letter writer. A response to an attack will only make the original letter writer look defensive and unsure of the position taken.

There are some ground rules to follow in conceiving letters to the editor.

I have developed a simple formula for writing letters to the editor (the ABC's):

Sign with name, full address, and phone number.

NOTE:

For faster appearance in print, activists should fax letters rather than just mailing them.

Writers should write only once in a while (a maximum of once per month). Activists who feel compelled to write more than once a month should write the letters and find someone else who is willing to sign and submit them.

Here is a sample letter to the editor my brother once wrote. I use the same formula every time I write a letter to the editor:

To the Editor:

The northern Minnesota traditions I enjoy most are hunting and fishing-they provide an aesthetic experience like no other, as I am sure many readers would agree.

Unfortunately, there are people who would like to prohibit hunting and fishing: US Senate candidate ___ is one of them. In the state legislature, she consistently voted against hunters and fishermen. For example: she voted to raise over 100 hunting and fishing license fees and to spend the revenues on porkbarrel projects (not on the environment as is usually done); she voted to make it illegal to transport a firearm, even if disassembled in its case and locked in the trunk of a car, while driving through a town of 12,000 or more people on the way to hunting grounds; she voted to make it a crime to carry a strung bow on a snowmobile. The list of her unreasonable votes goes on and on! Being from Texas, ___ obviously does not respect Minnesota values and traditions.

Her opponent, Congressman ___, on the other hand, grew up in rural Minnesota and understands what is important to us. ___ is a member of Ducks Unlimited and has been endorsed by the National Rifle Association. He has consistently voted to protect our hunting and fishing rights and to protect the land that we outdoorsmen use. ___ understands that we hunters, fishermen, and outdoors enthusiasts are the best protectors of the land we cherish.

Therefore, I would encourage everyone who enjoys the outdoors as I do to vote for ___ on November 8.

Name
Address
Phone Number

 

PUBLIC ACTIVISM

There are basically two types of public activism:

Independent activism could be described as doing things completely outside structured campaigns or political movements. This includes activities as simple as

It includes

Independent activism can also involve speaking publicly

Independent activism can also involve visiting lawmakers (lobbying). This is probably the single most effective method of grassroots activism. This is a much easier and much more accessible activity than many people believe. Lawmakers are not unapproachable. One must only make an appointment to see them (sometimes even this is not necessary). When making a visit to a lawmaker, an activist must remember to get right to the point (no small talk), and one must remember to get a commitment of stance from the lawmaker and, if possible, a promise to be a leader on the legislation.

Organized activism involves being a part of events organized by political groups, special interest groups, lawmakers, or candidates for office. These are perhaps some of the most enjoyable activities. They include volunteering for work at campaign offices, participating in parades and rallies, and attending campaign victory parties. Activists should be in contact with campaign offices, political party headquarters, or special interest group representatives to learn about the possibility of participating in these activities.

 

CONCLUSION

All of the activities mentioned here serve to keep opposition legislators or candidates aware of the varying views of their constituents. These activities let opposition legislators know there is opposition, in the first place, and that there are activist constituents committed to making legislators accountable for their views and votes. Sometimes such activism even sways legislators to vote the constituents' way, even if it is against their usual instincts, for fear of voter retribution.

Conversely, all of the activities here are ones that are appreciated by friendly legislators. These activities can serve to endear individual constituents to their legislators. This, in turn, gives individual constituents influence with their legislators when their issues of concern arise. It truly is effective.

Parting Words from the Author

I hope the hints and instructions here will embolden people to engage in independent grassroots activism. Every little bit of grassroots activism helps the entire political process. The most important thing is just to get started.

So, friends, get started!

For additional help or guidance, call the Minnesota Family Council, (612) 789-8811.

If you have any ideas for a second edition of this Guide to Grassroots Activism, please send them to:

The Minnesota Family Council
2855 Anthony Lane South, Suite 150
Minneapolis, MN 55418-3265

Additional copies of this Guide to Grassroots Activism are available for $8, postage paid.

 

APPENDIX

Federal

White House Comment Line: 202-456-1111
President of the United States e-mail: president@whitehouse.gov
US Senate switchboard telephone number: 1-800-962-3524
US House of Representatives switchboard: 1-800-972-3524

(Ask for your Senator or Representative, and the switchboard will transfer you to the appropriate office.)

State

Governor of Minnesota telephone number: 651-296-3391
Minnesota Senate Information: 1-888-234-1216 or 651-296-0504
Minnesota House of Representatives Information: 1-800-657-3550 or 651-296-2146

(One can call these numbers to find out one's legislative district and legislators.)

Media

Newspaper letters-to-the-editor fax numbers:

Minneapolis Star Tribune 612-673-4359
St Paul Pioneer Press 651-228-5564
Duluth News Tribune 218-720-4120
Minnesota Family Council Telephone: 612-789-8811
Fax: 612-789-8858
Web Site: www.mfc.org

Copyright 1997-2008 Published by The Minnesota Family Council / Minnesota Family Institute
No restriction on reproduction if not taken out of context. Call or write for information on additional copies.

Minnesota Family Council / Minnesota Family Institute
2855 Anthony Lane South, Minneapolis MN, 55418-3265
phone 612.789.8811, fax 612.789.8858, www.mfc.org