mfc.jpg (2277 bytes)  backgrounder.gif (3114 bytes)   mfi.jpg (2330 bytes)

 

Pornography: Don't Protect It, Reject It


Please Note: This backgrounder is intended for concerned adults; some of its content may not be appropriate for children.

Introduction: Pornography Defined

The growth of the pornography business to an $8-10 billion dollar industry in the U.S.1 has sparked a lively debate over what sort of sex-oriented materials should be permitted. At the heart of this controversy is a question of definitions.

Pornography is the term used to describe a work which uses sexual images with the primary purpose of causing sexual arousal. Some of this material may be "indecent," that is, offensive to some but still protected by the First Amendment. But some pornography is "obscene," and is not constitutionally protected.

What makes a pornographic work obscene? Unfortunately, that is difficult to define, and often comes down to the personal views of a judge or jury. But in Miller v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court put forth a three-part test for obscenity, and that test has been codified in state obscenity law (Minnesota Statutes 617.241).

  1. The average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, when taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest in sex.
  2. The work depicts conduct specifically defined as patently offensive.
  3. The work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.2

A less technical way of classifying pornography divides it into two categories: hard-core and soft-core. Hard-core porn often features total nudity, lewd display of genitalia, actual representation of sex acts, bestiality, incest, fetishes, homosexuality, exploitation of children and violence. Soft-core porn, such as Playboy magazine, may also include full nudity and lewd presentation of genitalia, but will not emphasize violence and sexual perversion.

While sales of "traditional" erotic are declining, technological advances have expanded the reach of porn. VCRs have made in-home viewing of sex films commonplace. Home video cameras have opened adult movie production to amateurs. Computer bulletin boards and software programs, some of which are advertised in mainstream computer magazines, present a wide variety of sexually explicit images. Future technological advances, such as video phones and "virtual reality" computer worlds, are becoming the new frontiers of the pornography industry.

Pornography merchants work to target various interests and demographic groups. There are trading cards featuring porn celebrities. One can find group-specific pornography for Asians, African-Americans, older people, pregnant or lactating women, obese men and women, and so on. If there is the slightest chance that the depiction of a sex act will titillate people, someone will produce and market it.

The Effects of Pornography

Though pornography is often described as a "victimless crime," it is anything but; in fact, it exacts a high social cost. Pornography affects not only those who use it, but also society at large.

A. The use of pornography as a compulsive pattern

Much of the current discussion of pornography centers on its compulsive qualities. It is unclear how many people are addicted to pornography, but some estimates run as high as five million.4 Researchers identify four states of compulsive behavior, each resulting in consequences which are increasingly serious as addiction progresses.

B. Pornography's unwitting victims

Sexually explicit material would be bad enough if it merely brought distress to its patrons. Unfortunately, it is impossible to limit the damage: people associated with a pornography user may also end up enmeshed in the downward spiral of degradation. Who are candidates to bear the burden of the addict's disorder?

Pornography, of course, is not the exclusive cause of sex crimes or of hostility toward women (except in "copy cat" crimes, where a person imitates violent porn). It is clear, however, that pornography fuels perverse behavior in what seems to be a growing number of deviant individuals. Many who study the problem agree that pornography's effect on society is growing, and the more and longer porn is used, the greater its impact on an individual.16

Taking Action against Pornography and Its Purveyors

Sexually graphic materials are widely available throughout Minnesota. Many people are under the illusion that pornography is confined to seedy adult book stores, and that only "dirty old men" are pornography users. The truth is much more shocking:

Despite the seemingly broad acceptance of pornography, several cities--including Cincinnati, Dallas, Omaha, and Oklahoma City--have successfully opposed the presence of pornography within their borders. For anyone who would like to consider a similar campaign, here is an outline for putting pornographers out of business in your areas.

In any effort to rid your city of erotic material, your success will depend to a large degree on the sentiments of the local community, your ability to gather concerned individuals, and the cooperation of law enforcement and others in government. We would suggest contacting groups which have won victories in the porn war or who lobby against the porn industry (see below).


 

Notes:

 

1 Barbara Hattemer and Rober Showers, Don't touch That Dial, (Lafayette, LA: Huntington House Publishers, 1993), p. 59.

2 Minnesota Lay contains a variety of prohibitions on explicit materials; some are listed on p. 3 of this work.

3 U.S. Supreme Court ruling Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, (1957).

4 Hattemer and Showers, op. cit. p. 112.

5 Victor Cline, Where Do You Draw the Line, 1974 (out of print).

6 For a technical discussion of habituation see Dolf Zillmann, Connections Between Sex and Aggression, (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1984), pp. 184-199.

7 See Hattemer and Showers, pp. 123-126.

8 cf. John Lyons and David Larson, "A Systematic Analysis of the Social Science Research on the Effects of Violent and Non-Violent Pornography." (paper given to the National Family Foundation Media Workshop, Pitt., PA. November 1990; also Pornography and Public Health, 1986 Report of the Surgeon General, (Washington, DC, 1989).

9 Mimi Silbert, Sexual Assault of Prostitutes, National Institutes for Mental Health, November 1980.

10 James Weaver, "Pornography and Men's Sexual Callousness Toward Women," in Pornography: Research Advances and Policy Considerations (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1989), pp. 105-125.

11 See Dolf Zillmann and Jennings Bryant, "Effects of Prolonged Consumption of Pornography on Family Values," Journal of Family Issues, 9, 1988.

12 Hattema and Showers, pp. 62-64.

13 Report of the U.S. Congress Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations on Child Abuse and Pedophilia, (Washington, DC, 1986).

14 Ibid.

15 Final Report of the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography, (Nashville, TN: Rutledge Hill Press, 1986), p. 268.

16 Ibid., pp. 265-266, 274-280.

17 CLEAN UP Project Survey, 1992-1993.

18 Final Report, pp. 251-253.

Organizations that you can contact for help:

 


Published by The Minnesota Family Council, 2855 Anthony Lane South, Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55418-3265, (612) 789-8811. No restriction on reproduction if not taken out of context. Call, write, or use our contact us link for information on additional copies. Originally published September 1993. Posted November 1996.

Minnesota Family Council / Minnesota Family Institute
2855 Anthony Lane South, Minneapolis MN, 55418-3265
phone 612.789.8811, fax 612.789.8858, www.mfc.org